B. rostrata max. size?

The forum for the very best information on loaches of all types. Come learn from our membership's vast experience!

Moderator: LoachForumModerators

Post Reply
plaalye
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:35 pm
Location: Bellingham, Wa.

B. rostrata max. size?

Post by plaalye » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:48 pm

I'm confused about this and would like to hear from some of you that are keeping these first hand. The profile says 8 in/20cm, but reading further in the linked article it says 10 cm, half that. My LFS has some and they're beautiful but I didn't want to deal with 8 inch adults in my 75. Thanks in advance for your input.

mickthefish
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:20 pm
Location: manchester, england

Post by mickthefish » Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:44 pm

you and me both mate, i saw the 8 inches and thought no way.
i reckon a realistic max size would be 5-6 inches TL and thats going some to get one to that size, they are very slow growing compared to other botia.

mick

User avatar
Emma Turner
Posts: 8901
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Emma Turner » Sun Sep 07, 2008 6:19 pm

Again, I'm sure this size will have originally come from Fishbase. Personally I don't think it is accurate, and I'd say 5" max would be typical. Yet the size on FB is followed by a reference number so there must be records of this somewhere. It wouldn't surprise me if the specimen in question was actually a misidentified B. almorhae.

Emma
Image
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
Image

plaalye
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:35 pm
Location: Bellingham, Wa.

Post by plaalye » Sun Sep 07, 2008 6:27 pm

Thanks Mick. That makes them similar to Kubotai and histrionica in size then? I'm always trying to pass along info about loaches to my LFS for the sake of the fish. They usually just ignore me but when I saw them labeled as "dwarf", and the profile said 8 in, I told them again and sure enough the gal wrote 8 inches right on the tank. I'll have to correct that.

User avatar
helen nightingale
Posts: 4717
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:23 am
Location: London, UK

Post by helen nightingale » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:17 pm

mine seem to be quite slow growing. sometimes you have to wonder how much of the info in fishbase gets checked.

Mike Ophir
Posts: 417
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:22 pm
Location: MA, USA

Post by Mike Ophir » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:18 pm

I think even 5 inches is too big. I would say 4 inches at the absolute maximum.

Mike
A proud member of LOL since 1998

NancyD
Posts: 1608
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:17 pm
Location: SF bay area,US

Post by NancyD » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:22 pm

Good to hear Mike O. No room for 8 in fish but 4inch...maybe. Lets nag Ned...
Image

User avatar
Emma Turner
Posts: 8901
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Emma Turner » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:26 pm

This 8" reference definitely needs looking into further. There seems to be such a discrepancy in sizes. In the Ornamental Aquarium Fish of India book they are listed as only attaining 4cm, which also is clearly inaccurate and right at the other end of the scale.

Emma
Image
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
Image

User avatar
helen nightingale
Posts: 4717
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:23 am
Location: London, UK

Post by helen nightingale » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:35 pm

could they have meant 4" not 4cm? my babies are bigger than 4cm SL.

User avatar
Emma Turner
Posts: 8901
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Emma Turner » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:42 pm

helen nightingale wrote:could they have meant 4" not 4cm?
The pic on page 97 definitely shows a juvenile, and they recommend them for small tanks, rather than say a medium sized tank for the B. dario. I know the book is 9 years old now and a lot more info is now available, so I think I'll email Andrew (one of the authors and a friend) and ask him about this.

Emma
Image
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
Image

plaalye
Posts: 887
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:35 pm
Location: Bellingham, Wa.

Post by plaalye » Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:58 pm

Thanks all for your input!

User avatar
Emma Turner
Posts: 8901
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Emma Turner » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:38 pm

I've emailed Andrew in India, will let you know what he says! :D

Emma
Image
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
Image

piggy4
Posts: 1017
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:25 pm
Location: manchester

Post by piggy4 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:39 pm

I think Rostrata's are hard fish to grow on really , a few years ago i managed to grow a group of 6 fish to about 4 inches standard length , the ones i currantly own are slow growing , but I'll keep trying !

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests