Hi everybody

The forum for the very best information on loaches of all types. Come learn from our membership's vast experience!

Moderator: LoachForumModerators

Petz
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:05 pm
Location: Luxemburg

Post by Petz » Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:07 am

:D Wow i am impressed it worked

So shari elo kanns du och meng Photoen kucken !

bis dann

En Letzebuerger deen sech hei ans do ganz kleng an der Welt fierkent

Carpe diem
honorem et fortitudinem

User avatar
LES..
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:34 pm
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by LES.. » Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:15 am

This is going way off topic but never mind...
TammyLiz wrote:LES...I feel like you're a magician.
I'm glad that worked for you, there are some benefits to being a sad technology obsessed geek :-)
TammyLiz wrote:What is the difference between 0 and 1? And should I leave it at one of those or at 2?
OK the values do the following:

0 - Never send the Referer header.
1 - Send the Referer header when clicking on a link.
2 - Send the Referer header when clicking on a link or loading an image. (Default)

As you have already seen some sites block images from being loaded if you don't have the right referer string this is usually to stop people using copyrighted images on one server in pages served from another server. This is very useful if you have limited bandwidth. Most websites that do this match against a specific URL and reject anything that does not match, including a missing field, we are lucky that the site used by Petz does not do this. From this description I hope that you have worked out that if there are now websites that you visit that have missing images it is due to this change and you should set the value back to 2.

There are some websites out there that use the referer field to do tricks like creating dynamic back links on the new page that you visit, this will work with the value set to 1 or 2 but not 0.

If you are paranoid about sites knowing where you have come from leave this setting at 0 and appreciate that some bits of the web may become that bit less friendly to you ;-)

User avatar
Mad Duff
Posts: 2821
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:58 am
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
Contact:

Post by Mad Duff » Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:05 am

Theres nothing wrong there Les, every forum needs at least one sad technology obsessed geek :lol: :lol: keep up the good work :lol: .

Once again lovely fish Petz :)
Image

Pardon my honesty - I am a Northerner

14 loach species bred, which will be next?

User avatar
Emma Turner
Posts: 8901
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Peterborough, UK
Contact:

Post by Emma Turner » Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:05 am

Your loaches are looking as good as ever, Patrick. :mrgreen: I particularly like one of the larger ones that has a lot of red on the leading edge of the dorsal fin. :D

Emma
Image
East of the Sun, West of the Moon.
Image

User avatar
helen nightingale
Posts: 4717
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:23 am
Location: London, UK

Post by helen nightingale » Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:40 am

Wow, Patrick, they are amazing fish you have there :D

i reckon i have been very lucky so far - photobucket has just worked, as for this 0, 1, 2 bit, now that is confusing :?

we definately need technology geeks here, and all sorts of other geeks. well, we are all loach geeks, after all :D

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests