Info and picture theft

The forum for the very best information on loaches of all types. Come learn from our membership's vast experience!

Moderator: LoachForumModerators

User avatar
Mad Duff
Posts: 2821
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:58 am
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
Contact:

Info and picture theft

Post by Mad Duff » Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:58 am

A friend sent me this link for Ebay last night the info is from the LOL species index and the photo used is Martins :evil:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/eel-kuhli-coolie- ... dZViewItem

They haven't even bothered to crop the image they have just blacked out Martins copyright :x
Image

Pardon my honesty - I am a Northerner

14 loach species bred, which will be next?

User avatar
TeeCeeJay
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:01 pm

Post by TeeCeeJay » Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:31 am

I've emailed the seller to ask if its a picture of the actual fish in the auction. Will be interesting to see his reply. Wait out.

User avatar
Martin Thoene
Posts: 11186
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998

Post by Martin Thoene » Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:31 am

I'll wait and see if you get a reply before I pitch in :evil:

Martin.
Image Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Image

User avatar
Jim Powers
Posts: 5208
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Bloomington, Indiana

Post by Jim Powers » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:44 am

Notice your name and the date are obscured in the lower left corner. :evil:
Image

Beowulf
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:18 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by Beowulf » Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:56 am

I guess some people feel that be blacking out the copyright it makes it void..... :?

User avatar
JonGuerriero
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: NH, USA
Contact:

Post by JonGuerriero » Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:05 am

I'm a little curious about this....first let me say that I agree 100% that people like this should not be using these images that are clearly and obviously trademarked. That being said, what recourse do you really have? If they had asked your permission would have given it? Is the concern here that the seller may be misrepresenting what he is selling?

Please do not take this post the wrong way, I am just curious.



Also, you guys must spend a lot of time looking at eBay and AquaBid, because it seems like something like this pops up a lot :roll:

User avatar
shari2
Posts: 6224
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: USA

Post by shari2 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:15 am

I believe Mad got this from a friend. 8)

And yes, stuff like this happens alot. Sellers often use pics of fish which are not the fish they are selling. Is this fair business practice? If the fish is in their possession can they not take their own photo? If not, do they not have a language they can communicate in to describe the fish/item they are selling?

Though it may not be my pics that are pirated, i find it disturbing that sellers would misrepresent their items in this way. As a buyer, I'd want to see what I am actually bidding on. Not someone else's pic of a similar (or not?) thing.

Find it bordering on the deliberate attempt to deceive, and at the least a lazy man's way to make a buck. I would not buy from a seller who clearly has marked out a signature on a picture. I mean, there's a black line through something at the bottom of that image where names/dates/copyright often goes. Suspicious, i would be.
books. gotta love em!
http://www.Apaperbackexchange.com

User avatar
Martin Thoene
Posts: 11186
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998

Post by Martin Thoene » Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:28 am

I believe that the the fact that the fish is obviously not the exact one(s) being sold plus the use of someone else's image for personal profit is the issue here.
If someone uses my image I call that flattery to an extent. If they use it to make coin I say, "What's in it for me?". The answer is zip.
As I think I've said before, photos to me are not so vitally important as I'm not making a living selling my images and the creation of one is as simple as point, snap, download, and edit.

My big objection is companies like that British mail-order aquatics company who is using my Clown-Loach artwork at the top of a webpage.....the LOL logo.....and continues to do so long,long after replying to an E-mail promising they would remove it.

Hand-created artwork stealing I take very personally. If the darned company had any indication of a snail-mail address on their website they would be getting a very pointed letter from the Solicitor's where my sister works in England :evil:

Martin.
Image Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Image

User avatar
JonGuerriero
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: NH, USA
Contact:

Post by JonGuerriero » Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:34 am

Martin Thoene wrote:I believe that the the fact that the fish is obviously not the exact one(s) being sold plus the use of someone else's image for personal profit is the issue here.
If someone uses my image I call that flattery to an extent. If they use it to make coin I say, "What's in it for me?". The answer is zip.
As I think I've said before, photos to me are not so vitally important as I'm not making a living selling my images and the creation of one is as simple as point, snap, download, and edit.

My big objection is companies like that British mail-order aquatics company who is using my Clown-Loach artwork at the top of a webpage.....the LOL logo.....and continues to do so long,long after replying to an E-mail promising they would remove it.

Hand-created artwork stealing I take very personally. If the darned company had any indication of a snail-mail address on their website they would be getting a very pointed letter from the Solicitor's where my sister works in England :evil:

Martin.
I'm pretty handy with a computer....if you could tell me which site it is I'm pretty sure I could track down an address....if you're interested.

User avatar
Martin Thoene
Posts: 11186
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998

Post by Martin Thoene » Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:12 pm

Hehe! :twisted: I just had another look at the site and found an address.

http://www.aquatics-warehouse.co.uk/acatalog/

I must talk to my Sister Image

Martin.
Image Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Image

User avatar
JonGuerriero
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: NH, USA
Contact:

Post by JonGuerriero » Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:18 pm

Martin Thoene wrote:Hehe! :twisted: I just had another look at the site and found an address.

http://www.aquatics-warehouse.co.uk/acatalog/

I must talk to my Sister Image

Martin.

That's pretty blatant use of the logo....what are they thinking.

EDIT: They must think it's ok because they are using the mirror image :roll:

User avatar
Icewall42
Posts: 345
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Levittown, PA
Contact:

Post by Icewall42 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:04 pm

Wow... that's disgusting when people do that. So many people think they can snag pictures willy nilly without giving due credit. That's terrible! I'd be emailing both those people with some serious complaints.

User avatar
shari2
Posts: 6224
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: USA

Post by shari2 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:36 pm

That being said, what recourse do you really have?
and therein lies the problem...
books. gotta love em!
http://www.Apaperbackexchange.com

User avatar
TeeCeeJay
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:01 pm

Post by TeeCeeJay » Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:32 pm

I sent this...

"Hi! Is that a photo of the actual fish we are bidding on?"

I recived this...

"Yes"

Lyin' cheatin' b*stard :twisted:

TC

User avatar
Icewall42
Posts: 345
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Levittown, PA
Contact:

Post by Icewall42 » Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:37 pm

The nerve.... I really want to catch him redhanded. That schmuck!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 187 guests