
Gastromyzon sp. (more pics added 30th Aug)
Moderator: LoachForumModerators
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
- Jim Powers
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
- Martin Thoene
- Posts: 11186
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:38 am
- Location: Toronto.....Actually, I've been on LOL since September 1998
Pretty darned amazing eh?
It looks rather similar to Hendra's SK04
http://www.loaches.com/species-index/ga ... -unknown04
.....just more intense yellow.
Hendra thought SK04 might possibly be a local variety of Gastromyzon psiloetron, known from East Kalimantan. Anybody got a picture of that?
Martin.
It looks rather similar to Hendra's SK04
http://www.loaches.com/species-index/ga ... -unknown04
.....just more intense yellow.
Hendra thought SK04 might possibly be a local variety of Gastromyzon psiloetron, known from East Kalimantan. Anybody got a picture of that?
Martin.

- The.Dark.One
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:56 pm
- Location: Castleford, England
Mmmm..
The closest in terms of a combination of body and head pattern, and mouth morphology is G. cranbrooki. However, the pattern on the fins are different and the head shape seems more extended on your fish. Some Bornean Suckers have different fin colours depending on the gender, and I think the head shape can differ also between the genders. Closest I can find is G. cranbrooki but by no means definite.
The closest in terms of a combination of body and head pattern, and mouth morphology is G. cranbrooki. However, the pattern on the fins are different and the head shape seems more extended on your fish. Some Bornean Suckers have different fin colours depending on the gender, and I think the head shape can differ also between the genders. Closest I can find is G. cranbrooki but by no means definite.

Lord Foul The Despiser, Lord of the Flies, Lucifer, Beelzebub, Mephistopheles, Satan, Iblis, Samael, The Dark Lord, The Abhorred, Azazel, Anubis, Pluto, Hades, etc
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:22 pm
- Location: MA, USA
- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
- Jim Powers
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Looking at Tan's book, there are several possibilities, with many of the same or similar characteristics.
>cranbrooki-right pattern, gold sheen on fins(no mention of yellow), but it has a secondary rostrum which yours does not.
>fasciatus-similar pattern, gold sheen on fins (no mention of yellow).
>lepidogaster-similar pattern, description mentions wide variation of color and patterns. This range of color includes orange edges of fins and yellowish-green fins in some specimens.
>embalohensis-similar pattern, yellow fins on female, red on male. Wrong number of bars on caudal fin.
So, you can see how confusing this can be with so many similar species.
I would be nice if Dr. Tan could take a look at this fish.
>cranbrooki-right pattern, gold sheen on fins(no mention of yellow), but it has a secondary rostrum which yours does not.
>fasciatus-similar pattern, gold sheen on fins (no mention of yellow).
>lepidogaster-similar pattern, description mentions wide variation of color and patterns. This range of color includes orange edges of fins and yellowish-green fins in some specimens.
>embalohensis-similar pattern, yellow fins on female, red on male. Wrong number of bars on caudal fin.
So, you can see how confusing this can be with so many similar species.
I would be nice if Dr. Tan could take a look at this fish.

- Emma Turner
- Posts: 8901
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:07 pm
- Location: Peterborough, UK
- Contact:
- Jim Powers
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:15 pm
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 172 guests