optimum size tank for...

The forum for the very best information on loaches of all types. Come learn from our membership's vast experience!

Moderator: LoachForumModerators

Post Reply
User avatar
kaz
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:59 am
Location: South Wales

optimum size tank for...

Post by kaz » Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:04 pm

Hello

I am in the process of rehoming some clown and yoyo loaches that I will not be able to provide adequate tank space for (unfortunately :cry: - they are being picked up on friday :cry: ). They will have the home they need to keep them happy and healthy and after 1 1/2 years I am going to be very sorry to see them go, even though I know they will be better off.

My question is.... can anyone suggest a loach sp that will be able to stay in a 100 litre tank approx 85cm long for good? (yes, I know :oops: , my poor lil clowns were far too cramped - they were due to be moved to my boyfriends 5ft tank, but we split up. The saga continued when I couldnt afford such a big tank myself followed by my car needing a new engine !which eventually cost me £1000 - leaving me very out of pocket) I will re-think other tanks MUCH further down the line now.

What is the optimum size tank for pangio kuhlii or Y. sidthimunki or N.Ornatus? I have read up and get contradicting information (60cm min, 20g min, 30g min, 12g etc - for the Y.sidthimunki in any case)

I may not get these dudes...just floating ideas around. I suppose Im hoping to soften the blow of losing such wonderful fish, by planning my future loaches. I do not want to re-home ever again.

Thanks for reading

Kaz

User avatar
Tinman
Posts: 1485
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:21 pm
Location: Kansas,USA

Post by Tinman » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:28 pm

Striatas and Sids stay small.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 422
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Grange Park, Thatto Heath. St Helens.
Contact:

Post by Doc » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:52 pm

B.striata, Y.sidthimunki, Pangio species should be fine for most setups.

What other tankmates do you have and what type of filtration etc do you possess?
So many species of fish yet so little time, space and money to keep them all...

Diana
Posts: 4675
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:35 am
Location: Near San Franciso

Post by Diana » Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:13 am

I would suggest fish smaller than about 3" for your tank. Relatively sedentary fish to 3" might work, but more active fish, keep them smaller.
Sids, Kuhlies, Zebras... these would work. Schisturas, other small ones, depending on set up.
Yes, what sort of water movement can you do, and what sort of look do you want?
You could do a small Hillstream set up, but go with smaller fish such as Schisturas, Darters (Darters are a group of Tetras that live in fast moving water), Danios and similar small fish. You would need roughly 2000 liters per hour water movement, set up like Martin's Hillstream manifold.
Slightly slower moving water, well planted, would work for the Loaches listed above, perhaps with a small school of Tetras, Barbs, or Rasboras.
100 liters = 26.4 American gallons, 85 cm long = 32".
This is not too far off of the 29 American gallon tank. (Which really does not hold 29 gallons)
38 tanks, 2 ponds over 4000 liters of water to keep clean and fresh.

Happy fish keeping!

User avatar
kaz
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:59 am
Location: South Wales

Post by kaz » Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:05 am

Doc wrote:B.striata, Y.sidthimunki, Pangio species should be fine for most setups.

What other tankmates do you have and what type of filtration etc do you possess?
Hello
Thank you for your replies everyone.

I have 1 dwarf cockatoo female cichlid, 1 false SAE, 5 pygmy corys, 2 otocinclus (I intend to increase the otos numbers soon)

I have 5 lampeye panchax and 5 pygmy corys in my Q tank at the moment.

I have a juwel tank (the old version of Rekord 800) with a 1000l/h powerhead and their standard internal filter. I have an extra powerhead from an old tank to give extra flow for the loaches. I can remove this when necessary.

Here is a picture of my set up a few months ago and a picture of it how it is now.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Thanks :)

Kaz

User avatar
shari2
Posts: 6224
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: USA

Post by shari2 » Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:56 am

Lovely tank, kaz! 8)

User avatar
kaz
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:59 am
Location: South Wales

Post by kaz » Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:52 pm

shari2 wrote:Lovely tank, kaz! 8)
Thank you Shari :D

Im much happier with it how it is now, but will try and hide the tube at the front once ive caught and re-homed the clowns. It's in there to help catch them (har har - who am i kidding!) Ive NEVER had to catch them before - should be fun!

Thanks again.

Kaz

User avatar
Bully
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: South Wales

Post by Bully » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:07 pm

Nice looking tank :D

You have a few bottom dwellers already, and that would influence my choice some. I personally would look at Y. sidthimunki, they are more likely to provide better entertainment than perhaps B. striata would. Sids are more likely to shoal throughout the tank and not spend so much time on the bottom also, B. striata can get more reclusive as they mature. I have not kept loaches with Dwarf Cichlids so I cannot comment on their compatibility with your A. cacatuoides.

Both Maidenhead Aquatics in Radyr and Bridgend have stock of Y. sidthimunki. Bridgend had at least 20 the last time I was there, but they were very small, smaller than I've ever seen them for sale. There was about 9 in Radyr when I was there last Friday. MA @ Radyr also had some mature B. striata in so if either of those are close to you I would advise going to have a look :)

User avatar
kaz
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:59 am
Location: South Wales

Post by kaz » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:45 pm

Bully wrote:Nice looking tank :D

You have a few bottom dwellers already, and that would influence my choice some. I personally would look at Y. sidthimunki, they are more likely to provide better entertainment than perhaps B. striata would. Sids are more likely to shoal throughout the tank and not spend so much time on the bottom :)
Yes, I thought this too - too many bottom dwellers? because I would eventually be moving my other 5 pygmy corys into the main tank.

I havent had any problems with my cichlid and the loaches - she pretty much is 'top tank girl' anyhow :lol:

Thanks for advise on Maidenhead places - I will ponder some more and make sure I make the right decision - I am leaning towards the Y.Sidthimunki though :wink:

Kaz

User avatar
Bully
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: South Wales

Post by Bully » Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:33 am

kaz wrote: Thanks for advise on Maidenhead places - I will ponder some more and make sure I make the right decision - I am leaning towards the Y.Sidthimunki though :wink:

Kaz
Be prepared to dig deep, I would always recommend a minimum of 6 and a group of six will set you back about £50. Well worth it in my opinion though :D

User avatar
kaz
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:59 am
Location: South Wales

Post by kaz » Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:10 am

Yes, am prepared to pay :D They are wonderful!

Thank you

I will keep you posted :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 131 guests