Oi! Enough of the doddering old deaf fart stuff....here quite clearly on page 149, paragraph 7, it quite clearly states.....

"No competitor may make reference about the adjudicator's age and its relationship to cognitive function."
Mark Janssen is absolutely correct that he mentioned 1946 first, but he did not specifically state "It is 1946", therefore I have to disregard that mention and award the non-prize to Adam for making a specific statement.
However, Mark is also correct that an immaterial "nothing" differs from a material "nothing". It is in fact a double-negative and therefore "something".
So after rechecking my data and conferring with my assistants (an otherwize unemployed
Botia dario and a particularly gifted Algae wafer), I am awarding the "nothing" to Adam and Mark Janssen receives an honourable mention and "something"......something ethereal.
Sophie: I think that would be cool on your CV. What does that mean? One who takes information and analizes it? We used to call that a "Discus Keeper"
Martin.